ToutWAF versus the usual alternatives
Cloud WAAPs are simple but send your traffic to a third party. Appliances are powerful but heavy and costly. Open source is flexible but demands expertise. ToutWAF combines the strengths of all three, and looks after your servers too. Below: a generic view by category, then a product-by-product table.
| ToutWAF | Cloud WAAPe.g. Cloudflare, Akamai, Imperva | Enterprise WAF appliancee.g. F5, FortiWeb | Open sourcee.g. ModSecurity + CRS, BunkerWeb, open-appsec | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Self-hosted, data stays with you | ✓ | ✕ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pro admin console | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ~ |
| OWASP CRS and SecLang compatible | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ✓ |
| API schema validation and JWT checks | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ~ |
| Advanced anti-bot: fingerprinting, scoring | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ~ |
| Layer-7 anti-DDoS and adaptive limits | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ✕ |
| Client-side protection (CSP, script monitoring) | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ✕ |
| Learning and simulation before blocking | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
| Explained events, one-click exceptions | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ~ |
| Policy as code: API, YAML, GitOps | ~ | ✓ | ~ | ✓ |
| Windows and Linux | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ~ |
| Keeps protecting if the control plane is down | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ~ |
| Console in 10 languages | ✓ | ~ | ✕ | ✕ |
| Predictable pricing, no per-request fees | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✓ |
General comparison of product categories, not of a specific vendor or edition. Example names are indicative, capabilities vary by product and version, and all trademarks belong to their owners. Where a ToutWAF capability needs a licence or has known limits, the Features page says so.
ToutWAF next to named solutions
A product-by-product view on publicly documented, stable criteria: where it runs, what it covers, how it is priced and what it does for your servers.
| ToutWAF | Cloudflare WAF | AWS WAF | Akamai App & API Protector | Imperva | F5 Advanced WAF / NGINX App Protect | Fortinet FortiWeb | ModSecurity + OWASP CRS | Coraza | BunkerWeb | SafeLine (Chaitin) | Wallarm | Azure WAF | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deployment and pricing | |||||||||||||
| Deployment model | Self-hosted | SaaS | Cloud provider service | SaaS | SaaS and self-hosted options | Appliance, virtual machine or software | Appliance, virtual machine or software | Self-hosted | Self-hosted | Self-hosted | Self-hosted | SaaS and self-hosted options | Cloud provider service |
| Can run on servers you control | ✓ | ✕ | ✕ | ✕ | ~ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ✕ |
| Pricing model | Licence plans by sites and servers, no per-request fee | Subscription plans | Usage-based | See vendor docs | See vendor docs | Licence or subscription | Licence or subscription | Free | Free | Free and paid editions | Free and paid editions | See vendor docs | Usage-based |
| Protection scope | |||||||||||||
| WAF, API, bots and L7 DDoS in one product | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ? | ? | ✓ | ~ |
| API security features | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ? | ? | ✓ | ? |
| Bot management | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ✓ | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Layer-7 DDoS and rate limiting | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ~ | ~ | ? | ? | ? | ~ |
| Servers and console | |||||||||||||
| Console in many languages | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ? | ✓ |
| Built-in agent and cluster for your servers | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Host audit with one-click remote fixes | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| Remote terminal and SSH install from the console | ✓ | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
As of October 2026, based on public vendor documentation; it may change. Only what is documented is marked; a blank assumption is never made, so when we are not sure the cell says see vendor docs. For ToutWAF, only what is implemented in the current release is marked. This page is not a product test and gives no performance figures. Product names and trademarks belong to their owners and imply no affiliation. Please verify with each vendor before deciding.
Detection benchmark
The project measures detection on its own small corpus (109 attack payloads in 15 categories and 73 legitimate inputs, each sent through four channels) and runs a load test of the proxy. The figures and their method are in the documentation, with their limits.
No independent measurement published| Metric | Independent measure | Design target |
|---|---|---|
| Detection rate (true positives) | none yet | — |
| False-positive rate | none yet | — |
| Balanced accuracy | none yet | — |
| Added latency, p99 | none yet | < 1 ms |
| Requests per second, per core | none yet | > 20 000 |
No independent suite (such as GoTestWAF) has been run and no comparison with another product exists. The figures from the project's own corpus are published, with their method and limits, in the documentation; they are not repeated here because they are not independent. Targets are design goals, not results. Measure your own deployment with the built-in benchmark.
Put a shield in front of your applications today
Install it on your own server, or get in touch to talk about licences.